Thread:Acebatonfan/@comment-31018854-20171122164037/@comment-31018854-20171122211747

Acebatonfan wrote: Caicedo5 wrote: Yes there are several images and videos of the group's places even being on the front page and being lively. The group exceeded that number in members as I stated in the article. I don't know why you would just remove it without asking any questions or even caring enough to atleast read it. What pictures? What videos? It's one thing to say they exist, but what I want to see is actual proof (I am clueless as to where the evidence is).

The page isn't removed, but it is in your userspace. There are very few differences between pages in the mainsapce and your userspace (for instance, editors aren't expected to maintain pages that are in the userspace if they become outdated). Maybe if you hadn't deleted the article, or messed with it you would have seen the evidence.