Thread:Mark Otaris/@comment-4360159-20160812073040/@comment-4196050-20160813005822

The JoTS wrote:

Mark Otaris wrote: though ParisAndStuff says he created the account before being banned. Luckily I investigated this when gathering evidence for the checkuser request. ;) The QueefyBrassiere account was created on this wiki minutes after one of ParisAndStuff's blocks.

Mark Otaris wrote: I think we should block him either indefinitely, or for a year, and only lower the block length if he can convince us that he wishes to return to contribute to the wiki in good faith. I'm leaning towards a year myself (though at one point I was considering 6-9 months), but I'm a bit hesitant to apply the indefinite block guidelines in this situation. Perhaps I'm thinking a bit too soft though.

I have also asked Acebatonfan for her opinion before changing the block. (Although, if one of y'all is itching to change it ASAP, for whatever reason– then by all means...) Since the checkuser shows that he was (most likely) sockpuppeting, he definitely should have his block extended to at least 1 year. He has made multiple good faith contributions, which has me a bit conflicted as to whether an infinite block would be appopriate (it's like he only acts in bad faith whenever he is bored versus wanting to do malice all the time).