Thread:JohnScott28/@comment-34265951-20180405025302/@comment-35176051-20180406230327

Anzu-TLK wrote: Hi, if you could not continue the edit war again, that'd be useful- the revision I set it to when I locked the page is where it needs to stay, do not add/undo the previously disputed information without explaining its purpose here. I shall explain the purpose for each thing added then.

Making Termination and Controversy surrounding the termination makes sense. The termination for exploiting has already been confirmed and only goes over what is 100% confirmed without any theories. The controversy surrounding it talks about all the controversy (obviously). It goes over most conspiracies about the situation, evidence (major/well known only) that could back these theories from both sides (the ones who think the termination was fair and the one's who do not), and proving a common misconception to be untrue (the one him exploiting on a livestream). Adding all of the theories to the Controversy part makes sense because those are the things people talk about when debating the termination, which was widely debated and still is. It shouldn't be removed nor should parts in it be taken out because its too long. If someone thinks it's too long, they can compress it and not remove it. Also there are numerous pages with the same amount or even more information about someone's profile, so if someone isn't going to change those because of the length then this one shouldn't be changed either. It shouldn't be removed either because it's "wrong", none of the theories added to the Controvery section has been confirmed wrong or right. There's evidence to back these claims, and that's it.

Removing YouTube related things from the criticism section was done because it's irrelevant to this page. This is a CowCowManManThingIt page, not a greenlegocats123 or CowCowManManThingIt/greenlegocats123 page.