Thread:Anzu-TLK/@comment-36422306-20180802015215/@comment-26397550-20180802030435

Hi, thanks for replying here. First off, I should note that harassment or making this based off putting down each other will not be tolerated. It'll just have you blocked.

When we lock a page from being edited by anyone but content mods and above, it's usually due to being target of vandalism or if it's being edit warred (of which is the case here). These are usually always temporary locks, at least until something is resolved, so that no one goes back and continuously tries to get their edit published (which will eventually just result in blocks- so the locking is to delay any of this). The current state of the page is little matter nor based in bias of what we think is right off the bat - in fact we barely care about what the content was, we just want the undoing to cease, and the content will be fixed once consensus is reached on what is to be done.

It should be made very clear that a wiki is a public project. We can not (and wouldn't, if we could) limit who has access to an article in terms of public users. We do not allow people to claim ownership of pages, either - again, public project, everyone is allowed to edit. This doesn't mean edits are always correct, but it should be kept in mind.

Pages are meant to represent a neutral standing and therefore should be free of any bias. Any editing being done to the page (really haven't looked whoops) that tries to paint the group in a positive or negative light is likely means to be removed. Articles are not an advertisement space nor room to showcase a group. They are for informative purposes only. Therefore, any sort of attempt to police the page to only contain information of either of your liking - especially if it's mandated by the group itself - is against policy. "Outsiders" are fully permitted to edit if they wish, and attempts to force otherwise will not be tolerated.

About the information: really, pull citation. For both sides here; where is the evidence to back up what is being added to/removed from/modified of the page? This is where we usually determine what edits to keep, toss, or merge.

Another call is our Manual of Style. Bringing it up, as it should be read before any further statements are made.

I've looked through what was being modified myself. Currently, the edits by LegitSenshi seem more in line with policies, and worthwhile for the page. I personally don't see many "lies" being added onto the page or anything...content appears to just be cleaned up to the guidelines- extraneous information removed (see style guide), bias reduced, etc. - and updates. Rank edits seem to be in line with the group, unless my vision isn't doing too well today.

Unless argued otherwise, I'm personally leaning towards keeping what LegitSenshi has edited onto the page, as nothing seems to be as claimed to be "lies" - just updated and fixed to be less biased.

Regardless of what is presented, it is requested that both of you cease any policing of the page. Anyone is permitted to edit, especially if it improves the page.