Thread:Anzu-TLK/@comment-36422306-20180802015215/@comment-26397550-20180802035742

Growncool7 wrote: I don't believe that I ever indicted LegitSenshi of lying as part of my response, nor have I accreddited the rank edits to be false. I was notified by someone in the Discord where LegitSenshi was boasting of his edits that he was doing them disingenuously and, looking through them, found enough incorrect errors to warrant a complete correction. I was trying to get in contact with LegiSenshi to talk about why I felt that his edits were incorrect, but I was sent evidence that made me believe he would have interest in talking to me as seen in these examples: 1, 2, and 3. From what I can tell, nothing was necessarily changed of the information, simply content was removed that was not relevant to the page. If there's a section that is incorrect, it can be corrected, but the rank edits were being undone, along with the removal of the "era" text and some other biased or unnecessary statements. It's best to manually correct things from an edit instead of fully undoing something because one part of it is wrong.

Growncool7 wrote: I understand how it can be percieved that I "police" the UCR page, but, as my history shows, I usually overrule incorrect edits and figured that I would be able to do the same with this edit and update the ranks independently of everything else that was edited., The policing was noted as you threw out terms such as "outsiders" & "unqualified", along with the interest in having the page limited to your management. We won't permit these.

Growncool7 wrote: I would also like to point out that LegitSenshi removed the headings from the History section of the page so now that they only list years. While this, in a sense, does no harm, a group of Roblox clanners was specifically chosen to create titles that would evoke the spirit of that era and spent much too long of a time doing so in an attempt to present an omniscient look at the past. This is a wiki - not a fanfiction site. Extraneous information in the interest of literary decoration is fully within reason to remove, as it shouldn't be on informational pages. Some of the headings could also be interpreted as bias, though not enough to be called bias removal. Again, you can review the Manual of Style.

Should note- behaviour or attitude doesn't determine the consensus, the facts do. Currently, the facts state that LegitSenshi's edits were more of adjustments to be in line with our editing policies and guidelines, but there may be one section in dispute, albeit the edits to it do just also seem like MoS adjustments. For clarity, can either of you verify w/ evidence (of which can then be put into a references section of some sort) which of the claims are correct, if they are indeed different? Not much can progress until then.

Additional comments: Assuming the content of the Discord screenshots is at least partially legitimate (I've not seen any dispute that it isn't, but I don't want to fully rely on them) - I'd rather that my responses nor this matter are not used for bragging rights or personal attack anywhere else. I'm here to help guide consensus on what to do with the page's content, and any implication of PA here may result in a block.