Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-24143974-20161011200657/@comment-26126721-20161012102613

MaintenanceRequired wrote: Thundermaker300 wrote: Q1: What will you do with administration rights? I understand the complexities of the administration rights. To put it simply, I will ensure that the articles are up-to-date, styled correctly to ensure that there is a consistent flow, and move/protect pages accordingly. If I delete a page which stir up controversy, I will bring it up in a highlighted thread to discuss such matter and to deal with it accordingly.

This way, it feels like I'm still partially in control and I'm still allowing the community as a whole to decide what is considered "notable". And as such, everyone will be pleased with the result.

Thundermaker300 wrote: Q2: How will you treat users if they disagree with you? Like I did when we had conflicting ideas about RBXLeaks, I will professionally deal with it. That is, I will politely ask why they disagree with me to better help myself and the other party to understand our viewpoints and our perspectives. There's no point in blowing things out of proportion if we don't know where the other party is coming from.

If the other party is not cooperating in the correct manner, I will simply acknowledge their perspective and take it into consideration.

Thundermaker300 wrote: Q3: How will you treat admins/bureaucrats if they disagree with you? Read 2)

Thundermaker300 wrote: Q4: If there is a vandal on the lose, and you are the only admin online when he is online, what will you do? Once I have administrator rights, fighting off a vandal is easier. I will simply block them first to prevent any new pages being vandalised. This will then help me track down all of the pages that have been affected by the vandal to then reverting back to its last acceptable version. Good answers. I support your nomination.