Thread:Acebatonfan/@comment-28188905-20151018012412/@comment-4196050-20151018230735

Mark Otaris wrote: When page protection prevents editors (see Thread:92799) from contributing to a page, it makes sense to unprotect it. So that is what I have done.

I'm wondering if there's a point in putting the names in bold when there's additional information rather than putting them all in bold, or not putting any in bold. I'm also wondering if we should add a link for all the administrators in the list even when there is no existing page. Red links are meant to be created for pages that should exist, though it wouldn't make sense to create pages about some of the administrators no information is known about.

I'm also wondering if we shouldn't use the real names of employees on their article when it is known (which is usually the case). Of course, if we do that, we need to specify the  parameter for the infoboxes so that the infobox knows the username on ROBLOX and can use it to create the right link (the infobox uses the   parameter, or if it doesn't exist the page name, both for the title of the infobox and to link to the user's ROBLOX profile). I might be pulling a huge brainfart, but I think the main reason why I was bolding in the first place was for part of the verification (at one point I was bolding all the admins names that I see within the Administrators group, searching up the other admins, and then removing the names of kids trying to impersonate admins).

As for putting in the real name, do you mean when the player's page is something along the lines of "Telamon (John Shedletsky) is a ROBLOX administrator, blah blah blah..." or the page name itself being "Community:Telamon (John Shedletsky)"?