User talk:Ajedi32

Hello, and welcome to my talk page. If you have something you want to talk to me about, please leave a message and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Also, don't forget to sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ )

Thanks, Ajedi32 22:05, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Talk Page Archives

"Houston, We got a problem."
This page is just... nah. Dtnc21 14:53, July 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Dang, Wikia's team is great! I reported that page as spam earlier, and look, it's been deleted today! Tgp1994 15:03, July 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I have an RSS feed of all the edits on the wiki, so I usually look over all the recent edits. Ajedi32 15:29, July 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ahah, your secret identity has been revealed! (I was kind of wondering how FreshBakedPie could have deleted a page :P)

Ninga95's Question
Hi im wondering how can i write for the real roblox wiki like MrDoomBringer. Or is this the really roblox.wiki

Ninga95 06:03, July 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * If you don't mind me answering this for you Ajedi, Ninga; the real ROBLOX wiki has been locked down, (and will be for the foreseeable future,) and this is not the real roblox wiki. However, with lots of contributions and work, we can sure bring this wiki up to speed like the real one :) Tgp1994 15:02, July 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * No, I don't mind at all. I would like to add one thing though. Only specified writers can edit the official Roblox wiki. MrDoomBringer recently held a writing contest to recruit more writers, but I think you missed it. Like Tgp said, with a lot of work we can bring this wiki up to speed. --Ajedi32 15:26, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Merging GUI Contest Pages
Should we begin making plans to merge the GUI pages, or should I move this discussion over to the talk page for its category? Tgp1994 15:34, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

You can talk about it wherever you want. I thought it would be best to discuss the merging in the category page, but if you want to use the forum that's fine too. --Ajedi32 21:20, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, so do we need to make plans, create a central page, or what?
 * Idk, i'll make a post on the category page about it. We can continue the discussion there. Ajedi32 00:34, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Idk, i'll make a post on the category page about it. We can continue the discussion there. Ajedi32 00:34, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Garrettwm
Robloxia

I think this garret guy needs a 1 day ban now, I just noticed his edit (and the reply to it :P)


 * Actually, he created the page... He didn't include any content though. I'll give him a while longer to respond to my warning. If he keeps making useless edits I'll block him for a few days. Ajedi32 15:54, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, sounds good. Tgp1994 15:57, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think there's still a bit of an understanding gap here :S Link
 * Okay, I can't take much more of this. Check out the message I put on his talk page. Ajedi32 16:07, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, I can't take much more of this. Check out the message I put on his talk page. Ajedi32 16:07, July 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * I think I'm actually beginning to understand why the admins have locked the ROBLOX wiki. It's because the larger portion of the ROBLOX community can't handle editing a wiki page. I remember a different community, for their forums, had a "smartness" system, and one would loose smartness based on how many grammatical/obvious spelling errors they made. (It would of course be redeemable if they fixed those errors.) Perhaps that would be an interesting system to implement into this wiki, if wikia even allows PHP scripting. Tgp1994 16:13, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's an interesting idea. But no, wikia doesn't allow PHP scripting. Ajedi32 16:18, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's an interesting idea. But no, wikia doesn't allow PHP scripting. Ajedi32 16:18, July 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Hmm, I'll try running it by one of the mods.

Something like Barnstars on Wikipedia?
So, I think this wiki should have something like the Barnstars on Wikipedia. It can be reverting vandalism/being a admin/mod/amount of edits/etc.

Of course, you would get punished if you purposely give yourself or someone else a award they don't meet the requirements for.

Example: http://dronian.wikia.com/wiki/Dronian_Wiki:Medals (A wiki I own.) Relorelo84 02:04, July 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * If I may add my opinion, that sounds pretty cool. Hopefully it doesn't encourage younger kids to start editing like mad. (Although, that would allow us to get reverting medals :)) And how does it classify reverting vandalism? By just reverting something in general? Tgp1994 03:31, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Reverting would be classified as reverting harmful or useless edits. And I agree. This would be a good idea. We need a name for these 'barnstars' though that sounds Robloxian. Pictures would be useful too. We could use the regular Roblox badges, or make new ones. Ideas anyone? Ajedi32 16:34, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Reverting would be classified as reverting harmful or useless edits. And I agree. This would be a good idea. We need a name for these 'barnstars' though that sounds Robloxian. Pictures would be useful too. We could use the regular Roblox badges, or make new ones. Ideas anyone? Ajedi32 16:34, July 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * How about calling them RW Badges? I know it's not original, but I'm not a good name designer. I have some ideas for RW badges.

(NOTE: Group badges below!)
 * If you get 50 edits on the RW, you get a circular badge. It's just bronze.
 * If you get 100 edits on the RW, you get a circular badge, that's only silver.
 * If you get 200 edits on the RW, you get a star badge, that's gold.
 * If you get 500 edits on the RW, you get a Surprised ROBLOXian head.
 * If you get 700 edits on the RW, you get a platinum badge. Shape? A ROBLOXian Head.
 * If you get 1000 edits on the RW, you get a diamond shaped diamond badge, with energy shooting out of it.
 * If you get a group with 1000 people in it, you get a badge, shaped like the Friendship badge, but it's Green, purple, and orange.
 * If you get a group with 10000 people in it, you get a badge, shaped like the Admin Badge, but it's the Group logo instead.

These can change. Relorelo84 17:28, July 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, badges would be a good name. We could do something like you suggested too. I think it would be cool though if we used edited versions of the regular Roblox badges. (Recolored, etc) Comments? Ajedi32 17:49, July 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * That would work. Relorelo84 18:21, July 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * And I doubt ROBLOX would mind. Let's do it! Tgp1994 19:06, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. Let's start making pictures. When you finish a badge, post it here so everyone can comment on it, decide on a name for it, etc. Ajedi32 19:59, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

LUA Dump
I was thinking that we should organize the LUA portion of this wiki a bit. I was thinking that we could have something similar to the browse tab of the left there, but then add a different tab that says something like "LUA Objects", then it has a list of them right there. That would make it much easier for us LUA programmers :D Tgp1994 14:51, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I could add a lua tab. The only problem is that there's way too many objects to put them all in one tab.... Ajedi32 19:37, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Are there sub categories that we could split them up into? How about it starts with Deprecated / Normal, then we go into things like whether it creates a click-able model in 3D view (I.E. Flag, Flagstand, Part, WedgePart, etc.) or not. Oooooor, we'll just make a link in that tab to the actual LUA dump page. Either way though, I would like to see that we have an LUA tab. (Is it possible for us users to add things to that tab?) Tgp1994 20:13, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, users can't add to the tab. It might be possible for me to wright the tab so that everything in a specific category goes into it. I'll see what I can do. Ajedi32 20:38, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, users can't add to the tab. It might be possible for me to wright the tab so that everything in a specific category goes into it. I'll see what I can do. Ajedi32 20:38, July 16, 2010 (UTC)

Personal Subpages
Hello, I haven't used this site much since the Gui contest, but I was wondering: is it within the rules for me to make a user subpage to explain a concept on roblox which is really quite exclusive to something I made?

I recently made a build tool which has a function that allows you to save your online work, but it has some complicated steps, so I wanted to make a description of how to do it on this site because it allows me to use images.

Please get back to me as soon as possible. I'm getting PMs of people's asking me how to do it, and I don't want to keep turning them down. :P

Blobbyblob 14:51, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, I think you'd be just fine doing that. I think you'd want to go to Blobbyblob\Toolnamehere or Blobbyblob/Toolnamehere. (I can't remember if it was a forward or backwards slash.) Tgp1994 16:47, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, as long as you put it as a user subpage that would be okay. Thanks for asking btw, most people just start making pages without even reading the rules. Ajedi32 16:09, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, as long as you put it as a user subpage that would be okay. Thanks for asking btw, most people just start making pages without even reading the rules. Ajedi32 16:09, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Informational ROBLOXian pages
I don't know about you, but I don't think we want the wiki to turn into an informational database for every single John Doe Robloxian. Perhaps we should be a bit more strict with the kinds of robloxian-pages that get created? Tgp1994 01:30, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Right now we have a rule that the user must have at least 100k place visits, but you're probably right. The rules do need to be a bit more strict. There are lots of people with over 100K place visits, and that number will continue to grow as Roblox gets more popular. And suggestions for a better rule? Ajedi32 16:12, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Howabout the user has to at least be a veteran? Granted, that's not a terribly difficult badge to obtain, but at least the user in question could perhaps be a bit more popular. 68.41.163.10 17:04, August 3, 2010 (UTC) (Err, I mean TGP1994 :P)

Maybe, but there are a lot of famous users who aren't vets. Ajedi32 18:03, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

How about either-or then? Either they're a Veteran, or have 100K place visits. Tgp1994 18:59, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, but that would be relaxing the restrictions, not tightening them. Ajedi32 22:20, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm... I guess I'd just be ok with the 100,000 place visits idea then. I've been pruning a lot of the userinfo pages, and I've marked them for deletion as necessary, so you might want to start going through them and deleting them. Tgp1994 01:10, August 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Actually, the 100K visits thing is already a rule. (See the Roblox Wiki Rules link on the sidebar.) I guess it just hasn't been inforced very well. Ajedi32 15:03, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Wait, I have a better idea. They have to have their accounts be 2 years old (Or what I call, a double veteran), or have a place with 100,000 visits. Relorelo84 02:06, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

That sounds good, although, how can you tell if someone has been a double veteran? Tgp1994 02:14, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Well, If they post on the forum, it shows what date they joined. Even though sometimes, the double vet doesn't post. Relorelo84 03:25, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Another oddity of the roblox website :S Sounds good to me though. Tgp1994 03:28, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Let's see what Ajedi has to say. Relorelo84 05:26, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

As I said before, 100K visits is already part of the rules. However, we may have to tighten the restrictions further, as there are a lot of people with over 100k visits. There are a few famous Roblox users without the vet badge though, so I don't know if that would be a good thing to implement. Basically we want articles about extremely famous Robloxians, but we want to weed out anything about non-famous or semi-famous people. It sounds like we may need a more complicated rule set for what articles should and should not be included. --Ajedi32 15:03, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

How about 250,000 place visits.. that would tighten the fishing rod' Colgatecity 16:03, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

I actually think 200,000 visits sounds like a winner. Tgp1994 16:48, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that might be a good idea. I think it has to be a bit more complicated than that though. (People can get famous for things other than place visits.) Ajedi32 16:57, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I got an idea. 200,000 place visits, plus a cumulative 100,000 downloads/takes on that person's models. (Or we could do something like 75,000 on one model only, I mean, 100,000 would be difficult to calculate if they have 5 pages of models.) Tgp1994 17:16, August 4, 2010 (UTC) P.S. Ajedi, what happened to your talk page?

But people don't just get famous for place visits or models. There are almost an unlimited number of ways for people to get famous, so I don't think just looking at stats is sufficient. I was thinking something more like this:


 * "Players must have at least 250,000 place visits, or be extremely well-known on Roblox for their creations or for other reasons. (Semi-famous players should not have their own article.)"

Comments? --Ajedi32 20:06, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, define "extremely well-known." Any builderman2365783 can come in here and say "Noez, i r teh famus gui!!111" How would you want to quantify extremely well-known? Based on the number of friends perhaps? Tgp1994 20:10, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have an idea..
 * The user must have:
 * - 150,000 place visits
 * - 1000 forum posts
 * - 10000 profile views
 * - 200 models
 * - 200 decals
 * - atleast 1 non-free modeled place
 * Idea? Colgatecity 18:38, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * How are you going to gauge any of their places as being non-free modeled though? They could use a script that end users may never actually see, that could be a free model. Tgp1994 18:40, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * How are you going to gauge any of their places as being non-free modeled though? They could use a script that end users may never actually see, that could be a free model. Tgp1994 18:40, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Ok.. free models of the list.. the list is now everything but the last one. The rope is tied. Now lets pull it'.Colgatecity 16:12, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Lordnathan Article hasn't been under a dispute since November 2009
I know no one hasn't resolved the dispute, but the article is very off; c'mon ROBLOX wasn't around in 2001. Colgatecity 16:06, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * If I remember correctly, that article was beyond repair in terms of spelling and grammar. I think we should just dump it.

P.S. Why do I get taken to a blank page when I click on the talk page for Ajedi32? Tgp1994 16:08, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Tgp, im talking about Lordnathan's inaccurate page. Colgatecity 16:10, August 4, 2010 (UTC) And PS - your computer might be having troubles.
 * Oh, nevermind, I was thinking of a different article. Tgp1994 16:14, August 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Is AJ32 on wikia right nao? it doesn't look like it much. Colgatecity 16:18, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * No I wasn't, but I come on a lot. You guys are right though, Lordnathan's page needs to be completely re-written. Ajedi32 16:46, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Should you or Tgp write it? I will subject this one to deletion again? Colgatecity 16:58, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll clean it up a bit... Ajedi32 17:03, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * There... Now all it needs is content. I'd appreciate it if someone could add some factual, neutral pov material to the article sections I created. I would have used the existing stuff, but I wasn't sure about it's creditability.
 * I'm not a pro on clan related stuff, (rather not get my head into that cloud anyways,) so I think I'm out for the count on that one. Tgp1994 17:18, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, i don't know much about that either. Don't worry though, someone will add info eventually. (I just hope it's accurate.) Ajedi32 18:04, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you think we should add a link on the front page that goes to a list of pages that need confirmation/are disputed? (Next to the list of stubs, wanted pages, etc.) Tgp1994 18:25, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. As long as we don't have to maintain the list ourselves. Everything in those lists right now is automatically updated. Ajedi32 20:13, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll try and hunt down one of our friendly neighborhood wikia mods, perhaps they can whip up a page that does that. Tgp1994 20:17, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll try and hunt down one of our friendly neighborhood wikia mods, perhaps they can whip up a page that does that. Tgp1994 20:17, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Lights! Camera! Edit!
As seen in an article from March 2010; i desided the lights might be an ok idea, should i post

them in a couple of forums to see if people like them or not? Colgatecity 12:31, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Ok.. maybe i will post in some forums with the icon. Hope you like it Colgatecity 12:38, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I dunno... I think Vandalism is always a no-brainer. Tgp1994 15:07, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * The main problem is this: The red one seems to be a bit threatening, and very discouraging to people who may otherwise want to make a useful edit. And like tgp1994 said, the yellow one is a no-brainer. Everyone knows that we won't tolerate spam. And the green light isn't really saying anything that isn't already obvious. Ajedi32 15:56, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * And I'm not so sure we'd want it on the main page in specific... we want to get a good first impression on that page.
 * Ok.. off the main page it is, but im putting these icons in the articles. Colgatecity 17:56, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * There's an easier way to do this. When I semi-protect a page, it automatically puts a template on when people try to edit it. (I believe it's possible to change what that template says.) These templates you are using use language that seems to discourage edits that this wiki desperately needs. If you want, I can use the semi-protect feature on some more articles, and we can make the existing warning template stand out a bit more, but don't think it would be a good idea to put those templates everywhere. Ajedi32 19:16, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have put them everywhere now -.- Anyways, im going to post again in a second with the new warning signs, hope you like. Colgatecity 13:01, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok.. didn't turn out.
 * I have put them everywhere now -.- Anyways, im going to post again in a second with the new warning signs, hope you like. Colgatecity 13:01, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok.. didn't turn out.

-_- Well, the new wording is a bit better, but there are still a few problems.


 * Red: There's a way to enforce that you know, it's called edit-protecting. Besides, pages under dispute should be edited. They just shouldn't become flame wars, and that's fairly easy to enforce.


 * Yellow: Wouldn't the wikipedia cleanup template work just as well?


 * Green: Just about every page is 'free to edit', so we don't really need a template for that do we?

Also, I would appreciate it if next time you would get everyone else's consent before adding templates to every page on the wiki. --Ajedi32 15:51, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Color Codes
A simple coding with differant coulors beside the title is all we really need for this wiki;

your right about the templates, theres no point to them. I showed my older brother (in college,

also a good editor to wikipedia) the templates, he said that the templates are all

common sence, and theres no point to them. So i will show you the coulor codes, it will

just be red, yellow, green and black circles. Heres what they would mean.

Red - Edit this please! But be aware that we may likely change your edits quickly.

Yellow - Edit this please! But this page has had a history of spam, so we moderate these pages lots!

Green - Edit this please! Your welcome to do what you like, but don't spam!

Black - Don't edit this currently, this page is under a dispute.

Hope you like the idea, and hope you are good at programming (LUA).

Colgatecity 16:00, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, that would be a much better system. I'm not entirely sure how to implement it though. It's true that I am good with LUA, but wikis do not use lua, and I don't think I have direct access to the php code. My suggestion would be this:

Green: Normal - No indicator at all

Yellow: - Semi-Protected Page - Displays a warning at the top of the page when users are editing the page.

Red: - Same as yellow

Black: - Edit-Locked - No indicator necessary because editing is disabled. (The system might already have a built-in indicator for this.)

--Ajedi32 17:13, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

There my current edits.. here i will make them better. Those are ugly looking. Colgatecity 13:36, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Perfect Editing System (hopefully permission is granted)
The past three articles (i wrote them! XD) talked about intresting things. About

LordNathan, the article says basicly that disputes here are fairly slow (to slow for

my loving to this wikia). About the Traffic Light; looks like you think the idea scares off

editors (which it does XD, look at the little amount of edits the past day.). And about

the most recent talk; about the colored circles. You tended to like the idea, but said

the "green" circle was stupid and time consuming. So; i got a new idea; lets keep

all the warnings up, but remessage them. Colgatecity 19:16, August 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Actually, I liked the idea with the colored circles better. I was just saying that the green circle would be very difficult to do, and suggested an easier way to do the other two colors. --Ajedi32 23:03, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lets stick to the colored circles idea then. Colgatecity 13:24, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lets stick to the colored circles idea then. Colgatecity 13:24, August 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay, so basically here's what we need to do.
 * 1. Get rid of the template messages
 * 2. Semi-protect any pages that are commonly vandalized.
 * 3. Update MediaWiki:Semiprotectedpagewarning and MediaWiki:Protectedpagewarning to be more clear.
 * 3. Update MediaWiki:Semiprotectedpagewarning and MediaWiki:Protectedpagewarning to be more clear.

--Ajedi32 17:23, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Abusive ip
It seems like we have a very attached person to JJxJ5. It's nice what they're doing, but it's getting to the point of vandalism. Tgp1994 18:28, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Who is it? Send me the link.[[User:Ajedi32|, August 15, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's 173.3.193.80. Tgp1994 13:19, August 15, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, at least they compromised this time. I still don't get they won't register. Tgp1994 18:54, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

WilliamTakadox8891.. heard of him?
I haven't.. i keep putting the article under deletion.. The IP Tgp just said in the past article has been removing my deletion notice. Colgatecity 13:22, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Np. Got it.

Thanks!
Thanks for the warm welcome. Have a nice day =D! Jasper B. Lee 14:01, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

WilliamTakadox not even famous.. lets IP Ban him
Lets discuss this matter.. i never have heard of WilliamTakadox. Colgatecity 12:50, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Just blocking the user would suffice. I'll give him a warning. Ajedi32 16:15, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Lights! Camera! Lets scare off William!
I actually think we should post these everywhere. It might help the wiki.. then again it might not. Colgatecity 13:08, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

I'd prefer a more automatic approach. Why don't you give me some suggestions on how we could change these templates to be more clear. MediaWiki:Semiprotectedpagewarning and MediaWiki:Protectedpagewarning. --Ajedi32 16:17, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Can you rename Wiki Pages?
Well, the UCR page says UCR United Clan of Roblox, instead of UCR. It's getting on my nerves. Dronian 16:30, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I can rename pages. But would UCR really be the best title for that page? Wouldn't a more complete name like "The United Clan of Roblox" be best? Ajedi32 16:34, August 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * It would be good. Dronian 16:36, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'm on it. I'll also add any redirects that may be needed. Ajedi32 16:37, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Dronian 16:37, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

http://roblox.wikia.com/wiki/Editing_System
http://roblox.wikia.com/wiki/Editing_System Colgatecity 13:22, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought we weren't going to use the green light? Tgp1994 17:20, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the green light isn't really necessary because the whole point of a wiki is that it is free to edit. The green light is assumed when no other indicators exist. --Ajedi32 17:30, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll make a few edits based upon what I think would be best. Feel free to discuss my edits here or on the project's talk page. Ajedi32 17:48, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

[ Content Deleted ]
[ Content Deleted ] Colgatecity 12:53, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

It seems that there were a lot of T-Shirt articles. I merged them all into one. Ajedi32 15:58, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

[ Content Deleted ]
[ Content Deleted ] Colgatecity 14:46, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, or whoever did it is just flat out being a noob. Ajedi32 15:59, August 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * [ Content Deleted ]Tgp1994 16:43, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif I think you should edit your article, if you don't, i will. - Colgatecity
 * I thought it was fixed. =/ Are you talking about my userpage or the article about me? Ajedi32 18:29, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * [ Content Deleted ] - Colgatecity
 * http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh131/maranne65/Laughing-2.gif ... OMG A SCHOOL OF THOSE LAUGHING SMILES!
 * Yeah, the vandals are getting really crazy. Maybe we should just semi-protect the whole website. Ajedi32 15:12, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Or direct guests to the login page when they try to edit ;) Tgp1994 01:26, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, or just put a link to the login page. We should talk to some of the other users about this and see if they think it is a good idea. Ajedi32 19:19, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Or direct guests to the login page when they try to edit ;) Tgp1994 01:26, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, or just put a link to the login page. We should talk to some of the other users about this and see if they think it is a good idea. Ajedi32 19:19, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Can yo teach me how to add a place in the places category?
Please, teach me!

Sure, just add this to any page. Remember though that all places must have at least 100K places to be considered famous enough to have their own article. Ajedi32 22:18, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

My account just got deleted :(
Im sad today. Colgatecity 13:38, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

And yes.. i know i know.. its my fault. Colgatecity 13:39, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

On Roblox? Why? Ajedi32 21:52, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Swearing at someone because they spawnkilled me. Eh at least i got an alt account in case this happened. Colgatecity 21:55, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Oh. I really don't get how people can swear online. I mean, in real life I can kinda understand because for some people it a reflex. But online you have to type it AND press enter. How does that happen? =/ Oh well, there's nothing you can do about it now. Ajedi32 16:26, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Ban this user. Now.
This IP keeps flaming my page and talk page. Look at the edits on my user page. A IP flamed it. Ban him. Dronian 21:57, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Done Ajedi32 16:19, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

[ Content Deleted ]
[ Content Deleted ] Colgatecity 13:59, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Got it. Ajedi32 16:21, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Content Deleting Innappropriate Content
Talk pages.. forum and articles.. etc. If they; or a part of them is CDed.. it means i found it offencive. Colgatecity 14:01, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

I am doing that so kids that look at the second best wiki for ROBLOX ever, they won't see cussing. Colgatecity 14:02, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that's probably for the best. Ajedi32 14:19, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

OMG
http://roblox.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Freshbakedpie

Explain this user as an admin. Colgatecity 00:20, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

He's my brother. I gave him admin powers so he wouldn't have to pester me about deleting pages and such. He doesn't come on the wiki very often, but when he does he helps me with touching up articles and deleting spam and such. Ajedi32 20:28, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

[ Content Deleted ]
[ Content Deleted ]

Not famous enough. Read the Roblox wiki rules, they lay out the guidelines for creating new articles. Ajedi32 00:20, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

[ Content Deleted ]
[ Content Deleted ] 99.249.133.245 23:03, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

I am CDing you noob. Don't say the 'cs-er' word on this wikia EVER. Colgatecity 23:11, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

May i have admin?
Please.. i think some users here need to be blocked. Colgatecity 23:26, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

If you ever need someone blocked you can always just let me know. If you really do need to be an admin though, I think there's a project page for making requests like that. Ajedi32 00:24, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

I requested it last week on that forum post. Colgatecity 21:14, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Really? I didn't notice. I'll go take a look. Ajedi32 21:58, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, that was the wrong page. Use the project page at Roblox Wiki:Requests for adminship The purpose of this system is so we can see if other wiki users would approve of you being an admin. (And don't worry, I won't count votes from spammers.) Ajedi32 22:11, September 10, 2010 (UTC)