Thread:Thundermaker300/@comment-24143974-20161010203318/@comment-30179749-20161012104128

After reading this, I'd like to place my thoughts on this subject.

I initially created the RBXLeaks page because he is both a (currently) popular leaker and the fact that a page for an earlier leaker, LeakBLOX, already exists. After reading your thoughts on these leaking pages, I also agree taking these down would be for the better. You already summed it up in your reply, with key statements like like...

'' "I see the ROBLOX Wikia as a means of informing wiki readers about the world of ROBLOX, and thus, we try to stray away from promotion of users unless they meet the guidelines." ''

'' "While some people classify RBXLeaks as a notable user for a page, others don't." ''

'' "This, in turn, becomes pretty hypocritical of the community as we allow some users that may not even be all that famous, but we straight-up delete others." ''

Being the one who made the RBXLeaks page, you should have it ripped off the wiki, as well as the LeakBLOX page too, just to make the chances of these compilations (addressed in the near-end of the second paragraph) slimmer.