Thread:Acebatonfan/@comment-27078649-20151014225849/@comment-4196050-20151016133022

Let's see if I can multi-quote without it turning ugly... Juststeven wrote:

I was falsely banned i didn't break any Terms of service. According to the ToS, ROBLOX can deny players access to the client at any time and for whatever reason, and the Community Guidelines state that the listed "rules" are not at all complete. If ROBLOX wants to ban a player because they're wearing a blue shirt, they can because that player agreed to the ToS prior to joining and acknowledged that ROBLOX can deny service to the player at any time.

Mark Otaris wrote: This wiki is an encyclopedia, so facts in it need to be reliable (referenced when they are challenged, as has been the case here) and subjects need to be treated in a neutral manner. If you're able provide references for whatever you'd like to be in the article and can cover it in a neutral manner, that's fine with me.

However, it's best for people who are involved in a topic (or who are the topic) to stay away from the article about that topic, because they are likely to be in a conflict of interest and not to be in a position to write a neutral article about it. Juststeven, I really want to emphasize the bolded part of Mark's statement. When in doubt, cite (this rule has become my best friend when writing term papers -not properly attributing my sources could cause me to get kicked out of the university for plagiarism). It's also a good idea to make sure what you're citing is considered reputable. For instance, adding an image of a forum post of Juststeven saying he has ASD would not be as reputable as directly linking to the forum post (because images can be manipulated). Juststeven wrote: "Juststeven is a builder who accumulated over 15 million place visits by performing bait-and-switch scams."

What you wrote is considered false because i didn't use bait and switch scams, I stopped in the end of 2012. In 2013 and 2014 i never false advertised, Therefore your information about me is false. Didn't is different than stopped. I consider didn't as having NEVER performed an action, while stopped gives the impression that the person performed it at one point but no longer does so. I might go back to the page and clarify that statement to "Juststeven is a builder known for utilizing bait-and-switch scams to accumulate a portion of his 15 million place visits." It still gives a similar message, but then I view that statement as the person performed the bait-and-switch scam at some point but may or may not be doing so now (instead of the person used it to earn all of his place visits and most likely still doing so). I still think it's a bit too wordy (or I might be too used to writing in shorthand and utilizing fragmented sentences for my pathology chart :P).