Thread:Anzu-TLK/@comment-30649439-20181119064900/@comment-34452948-20181119205833

Anzu-TLK wrote: Now that you've made me go take a bit of a better look at the thread with some context, he's been acting properly thus far. You've been the one making snarky remarks and randomly accusing him of slander baselessly. Alan isn't acting in bad faith - the information added really can't be interpreted as being slander at all?? It could just be incorrect or outdated information and they don't know. This is why I've been asking you to politely inform of what the section is concerning, and what needs to be revised.

I'll be pretty straightforward here. I'm not interested in any more false accusations or random slandering of other editors over misinterpretation - consider this a final warning for your behaviour, and a reminder to assume good faith. I would like to know what to revise the page with - what is correct/incorrect. Nothing else. First off

You call any evidence that I dig up about his past behaviour as "baseless slander" instead of accounting into why I consider his behaviour to not be of "good faith" as he has exhibited bad tendencies towards me in the past. You don't even bother to question the validity or ask for more info, you just play it off as if it never happened.

How do you claim to look into the "context" of the situation and ignore the big red flag ?

​​​​