Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-34265951-20180330130206/@comment-26397550-20180330131844

I can really consider it in some sense, though it's honestly rather situational. Kestrel is a notable group, but I have absolutely no idea who the owners are behind it, nor do I care. On the other hand, groups like Grotesquette which are kind of just single-dev groups out of convenience should probably be covering the owner (GrottyPuff) rather than the group as it's really just her stuff.

I'm not too sure just yet if it's a good idea to give notable groups automatic notability. If anything, I'd say that for a group owner to be notable just for owning a notable group, that in that particular case the group member threshold is higher than the regular group notability threshold, perhaps? Most of these cases where the owner is famous because of their group are rather selective and are better off just requesting an exception. But some of the groups- especially dev groups- may be better off covering their owners, even maybe additionally.