Thread:Zaydandalfie/@comment-34145139-20180105204621/@comment-4196050-20180106163729

Zaydandalfie wrote:

Zaydandalfie wrote:

Acebatonfan wrote:

Zaydandalfie wrote:

Acebatonfan wrote:

Zaydandalfie wrote:

Acebatonfan wrote:

Zaydandalfie wrote: They still get a lot of reports a day, as stated in the 2012 article about reports "A lot" is not the same thing as "115,000". I read the 2012 article, and there's no specific number. In the real world, if I pulled random numbers like that out of my behind, I can kill someone or get fired. Well it still works It doesn't, and if you were to do something like that on an article, that edit will be reverted. I've seen people get kicked out off colleges for fabrication (what you're doing). Explain how it doesn't work? Fabrication is when you make stuff up, like what you're doing when you say Roblox gets 115,000 reports a day (when the evidence you provide says nothing about it). We want to keep the wiki as accurate as possible.

Reports do work. Also it's my opinion that they get that many reports. But wiki articles should not have any opinions. You're trying to explain why you undid someone's edit by using an opinion (it's like saying "oh, this edit sucks" and then undoing it, when it didn't break a policy). You say "reports do work" and then "roblox gets a ton of reports" as an explanation, which makes no sense logically.

I'm trying to mediate this editing conflict. I wanted facts behind how you know Roblox receives 115,000 reports a day. You later claimed that was just a random number you pulled out of your behind, because you believe they get a ton of reports. We're trying to remain factual as a wiki, and at this point if you're undoing edits because YOU don't agree with what they're saying, which can be vandalism if you're undoing good edit. We're trying to build a wiki on facts, not opinions (and being biased in what we write about prevents us from being a factual wiki).