Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-31051019-20180206215400

I see so many pages that are supposed to be encyclopedia-type material. However, they constantly use second-person pronouns (you, yours, yourself), write with poor grammar, and sneakily work bias or opinions into articles.

For the second-person pronoun thing, it's just something people are not supposed to do in an encyclopedia. It is only used when absolutely necessary or when in quotes.

The grammar is unacceptable if one is typing an encyclopedic page. Proof-reading and peer-editing are things. Any person can get a friend to say to them that "he hav 10,0 plase visit" is not correct grammar. Now, I don't mean every little mistake, but I mean things that make the page look like an eyesore. Run-on sentences, fragments, commas or periods in the wrong place, etc. For example, this page: (look at the old revision's source). Also note poor formatting of instructional material and excessive use of "you." This, depending on opinion, can be seen on the "Spam" page. Speaking of that page...

The "spam" page involves opinions, such as "this is a spam that is annoying," and "but we all know one thing, you don't need Builder's Club to make a good game, all you need is creativity." No, not everybody knows that. No, not everybody thinks that spam is annoying. It's opinionated. The most funny one, "most players that have Robux post this type of spam." Whaaat?

So, to conclude, I pose this question: why are there so many non-eyclopedic pages here? I also wish to say: do not take this as "an attack against the wiki" or its userbase. This is me just pointing out some observations. Is it the userbase? Is it a lack of tutorials? What is it? 