Thread:Acebatonfan/@comment-34722333-20180612173615

I was just recently updating and rewriting the Beautiful Hair for Beautiful People article. Adding some information, and restructuring the retexture heading. When I was finished editing, I was stroke by a profanity notice, I checked back to see if I had typed anything that may be considered a 'bad' word but I seemed to find nothing. I have no idea how this happened, but I believe it is an error. You can check each statement in my edit here: Introduction: "The Beautiful Hair for Beautiful People is a hair accessory that was published in the catalog by ROBLOX on October 6th, 2009. It can be purchased for 95 Robux. It is one of the most popular hair accessories on the catalog for its simplicity and stylishness. Its popularity had grown attention for Roblox to create more retextures. As of June 12th, 2018, it has been purchased 2,182,975 times and favorited 212,620 times." Appearance: "Features black spikey hair."

Featured History
Retextures: "There are currently 13 different retextures of the Beautiful Hair for Beautiful People:" Trivia: Criticism/Controversy:
 * "In ROBLOX Studio, the Beautiful Hair for Beautiful People is known as Ultra-Fabulous Hair."
 * "Retextures of this hair are most commonly sold for 95 Robux."
 * "Five out of 13 retextures are Limited."

"This hat is very controversial for being considered an online dater item. At one point, the Beautiful Hair was on sale for 25 Robux which caused many players who bought it at full price to complain in the comments section, even though it was a negligible difference in price. It is often paired with Shiny Teeth, and this combination is criticized by some players because they find it obnoxious." 