Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-24531239-20180621014803/@comment-24041062-20180621015843

Well, considering this is not Wikipedia, and this is more of a reference guide and not an entire encyclopedia, I'd say sources would mostly have to be common knowlage/popular belief. That is because there are not nearly as many credible sources and studies. A lot of sources on Wikipedia are actual studies. However, there is barely anything to study. While a lot of sources would have to follow guidelines, they don't necessarily have to be 100% perfection. In conclusion, sources have to be mostly credible/actually by official developers. However, sources about leaked topics are not acceptable. That is just my thought, and I'm not a mod, so I can't be certain about reference policies perfectly, but that is what I would say is about right.

(sorry I wrote so much about sources [which I would not confirm, so please don't just go off of me without someone faulting me.] XD )

all of these are basically my thoughts just unwinding, I have a lot of summer camps/work, so I have a lot loaded onto my brain right now, which I could type forever XD

Anyway, if anything is not right, I'm willing to take fault.