Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-26126721-20151017210712/@comment-4812386-20160619175419

One concern I must bring up here is deleting articles. You have deleted many articles that I do not see a good reason to delete. One of these is Parents. It provides information about a feature which no longer exists, but that the feature no longer exists is not a reason to delete the page. We have many pages about previous events, about ROBLOX's history, or about other features like tickets or the ambassadors program that were removed. We shouldn't remove these articles!

Another is Community:ROBLOX/Happy Home in Robloxia. This game was one of the starter templates for a long time, and also used to be the default place for all new accounts. That it does not have 750,000 place visits is not a good reason to delete it; if nothing else, it is notable as a feature of the website.

Yet another that I would consider at least worth discussing is List of ROBLOX Fan Sites. This article had useful information, and, like the others, has been there for years. It is certainly questionable whether we want a list of fan sites on this wiki, but I think that should be discussed first.

You also deleted The Hunger Games with reason "Cleanup" and I cannot say I understand that deletion.

Other examples which I have restored and moved:
 * Community:Christina8787 (now User:Calhoun714/Christina8787)
 * ROBLOX Infantry Corps (now User:Kingpin12345/ROBLOX Infantry Corps)
 * X-101st Legion Main Army (now User:Arkinek/X-101st Legion Main Army)
 * Train Crashing (now User:CJBROBLOX/Train Crashing)
 * Wild West (now User:MangoMonkey/Wild West)
 * Community:Juststeven/MineBlox (now User:Awesome444a444/Juststeven/MineBlox)
 * Community:Jordanbenyon/Zombocalypse (now User:UnknownPerson/Jordanbenyon/Zombocalypse)

I also think it would be best if you moved any article with meaningful content to a subpage of the user page of its creator or main contributor instead of deleting them, so that useful content is not lost.

In general, I think any article that has been on the wiki for many years, has many contributors, and has good content or content that could conceivably be improved to become good, should not be deleted without discussion.

So given all that, I don't think I actually support the nomination.