Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-26126721-20161010192439/@comment-24143974-20161014054228

In this day and age, 16 is considered "2016". But I can see why there would be confusion. Kinda reminds me of the Y2K bug. This is why we should stray away from using mm/dd/yyyy, mm/dd/yy, dd/mm/yyyy, and dd/mm/yy.