Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-33418976-20180708004436/@comment-26397550-20180708174125

It's a bit misleading to claim that it takes hours to get things resolved by moderation. Indeed it's been like that recently. This is because I've been on vacation and a lot of the admins were jumping in and out of inactivity; there were two days where the wiki was unavailable with staff, and we only really had one vandal issue that didn't continue long. There are usually no issues with moderation.

It's indeed that your edits and activity is helpful, but sometimes you tend to get in edit wars, and you can become very apprehensive about this...

I understand it's been quite a while but you did get more than warnings- I believe that you did get blocked at one point for behaviour issues (should note that usually blocks are guidelines for saying no). I worry these behaviour issues would be a risk with major rights of content moderator. It's a lot of rights to hold, a very close step to administrator. I don't want to see you get set off by something and use these the additional power to cause problems in relation to it. It's not something that's easy to get off either especially when our bureaucrat not being on often is more of a problem. I don't want this risk here, seeing as the attitude is present.

Additionally, seeing as you're talking about blocking people, I'm not sure if you understand what the content moderator role even is.

I don't support for these reasons.

Note: did publish this too early when writing, so some of my response was missing for a few minutes...