User talk:Tman1319

Blanking pages for deletion
0Michael105 ( talk  ·  CC talk  ·  contributions ) 19:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry for that misconfusion, I was still new to fandom at the time. Tman1319 (talk) 17:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

UAF inaccuracies
The group was not founded in 2009 as a different group. I have been around clans since 2009 and can confirm to you as fact. Benblue9 is the earliest leader of UAF that I remember if that tells you anything. FalseWarrior000 has also been around since that time and can also confirm. Anyone who states otherwise is not well versed in their history and is attempting to pedal other, false narratives which is part of why clan history can be so misconstrued, as leaders often twist history so it sounds in their favor.

If you'd like to revert please let me know so we can discuss this with a Wiki admin. Thanks.

ThepracticeROBLOX (talk) 01:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


 * This is a couple of months late but the page is still locked, once it is unlocked, you can talk to Trajan to come to a census on what to do with the page instead of doing an edit war. We have talk pages for a reason after all.Tman1319 (talk) 17:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

"Rthro" bundles
hey, not sure why you're reverting all of my changes...

let me clear up some things for you:

it doesn't mean anything if a bundle includes the rthro animations or not. every single rthro and non-rthro bundle created after october 2018 includes the rthro animations, unless roblox forgot to add them. adding the animations is just something roblox does to all bundles now.

a bundle is an "rthro" bundle if the thumbnails of the body parts use the blank rthro dummy instead of the classic block character. more technically speaking, if the bundle is meant to use Body Type 100% or not. animations have nothing to do with it.

"rthro" technically refers to Body Type 100%. "classic r15" (non-rthro) refers to Body Type 0%. got it?

Xyrafrost (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * As I have said, if the bundle has Rthro animations, then it is a rthro bundle. Take the Artic Climber for example, it was released on January 25, 2019, (which is after October 2018), it does not have rthro animations since it is not an rthro bundle. You would probably say they forgot, but really it is not a rthro bundle. Tman1319 (talk) 17:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * the "Arctic Climber" was released in 2011.


 * if you really think that the addition of rthro animations determines if a bundle is an rthro bundle or not, then would you say that the "Dennis" bundle is an rthro bundle? and what about "Arctic Terrain Davy Bazooka"? that one isn't an rthro bundle, right?


 * once again, animations have nothing to do with it. a bundle is an "rthro bundle" if the body parts are designed to be equipped with your Body Type scale set to 100%. if you still don't believe me, then visit this article on the roblox developer hub, scroll down to "Body Scaling", and read the description for the "Body Type" option.


 * i've been noticing that this wiki is filled with tons of incorrect information, and i thought maybe i'd fix some of it, but i'm kinda changing my mind on that now
 * Xyrafrost (talk) 16:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi again, so to say this. Rthro in Roblox terms is "human", and with those human parts come the 100% body type you are talking about. While I do agree that bundles are by default given rthro animations, it also gives them the 100% body type. So a bundle in this state, it depends if they give a 100% body type or not, (or just simply look human, in Roblox words). And if you took the time to even look at the bundles such as Merfin the Great (which you said was not an Rthro bundle), actually does emit a 100% body type (I use BTRroblox, which is created by an official roblox admin), if you care to talk about this further be my guest, I will like to see you bold your words. Tman1319 (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

UGC articles clarification + extra note
Heya, just want to go over some minor things about recent page creations;
 * We do not allow pages of regular UGC accessories uploaded by the approved UGC creators at this time, as there is no notability policy for them. We moved some of these to your userspace. We don't have any reliable metrics to have notability policies overall for most UGC right now.
 * You may still find pages about some UGC accessories when we did allow them; these are allowed to stay due to grandfathering and they're fine to edit.
 * Per some internal discussion, in relations to the Vans account and the Vans World event + the pages you've been making of their accessories, we have appended the notability policy to clarify that accessories uploaded by accounts that aren't staff but are associated with an official Roblox event or partnership can have articles about the accessories. (You could also make a page for the Vans account.) This is just so that there's no strange grey area or unspoken exemption we made for these pages and why we left them alone. (i.e. it was fine to make these, we just made it so the policy lines up with permitting them. We're just letting you know as a heads up.)

Also, if you're gonna note things to users, please don't phrase them as warnings/reminders as that falls against our policies on minimodding. Thanks! ~ Karasu || user // contact // CC wall ~✨ 21:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Alright thank you for clarifying, and my bad for the minimodding, have a good day! Tman1319 (talk) 21:54, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edits (the jazwares stuff)?
I explained that I could not find a policy against links to other Fandom wikis, and I tried to explain that it wasn't necessarily self-promotion and moreso adding a relevant link to a wiki that the editor just so happened to be sysop on because there was nobody else who took on that role. HaiFire3344 (talk) 23:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * There's already a Roblox toys page + its subpages that can be linked to, and improved if information is not containing the same information. The wiki itself isn't necessary technically ~ Karasu || user // contact // CC wall ~✨ 23:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

FourthDev Page
Hey i dont know if this is where i send the evidence for the game here is the active one: the second game was terminated so i could not find a link, i can change the vists down if you like.

and here is the group, it says it was Founded by "FourthDev"
 * Hi there, don't worry you are at the right place, so just to clarify, the page you are talking about does not have 1 million visits, besides the game you are talking about is only has 300,000+ visits, which is not even half the amount of visits the game needs for it's own page. The group needs atleast 15,000 members to get it's own page. Both game, group and player do not meet with the notability criteria for the wiki policy. Tman1319 (talk) 00:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey thanks for the reply back. About the games not meeting the right criteria the original game: simulator-Under-re-development has at least 1 million. So if include the original game would that be okay? Im just trying to get into the community more and i thought creating a page would help me.


 * No problem, we would like you to join the community, it's just that the page is still not allowed. The game is from a different group, the group that holds the game though is allowed since it holds the game which has 1M+ visits, and the group owner as well for the same reason. The player though is not allowed, only reason they are not allowed is since they do not specifically own that group. Check notability criteria to see further. Tman1319 (talk) 01:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay yeah thats fine i used to be a tester for multiple groups the player I'm writing about had so i know alot of info about them and the games they made. The group is locked however it was owned by the same person if I remove the current game and group since they are not allowed and add in the original game and group that would be fine right?


 * If you are writing the article after the initial owner gave it to another player, the group should still not fall under ownership. Since the group is locked however, I'd suggest not creating it, since you have the link to the game though, you can create it since it has enough visits. I'd suggest not creating the group's owner article though, if the group can't be linked to them since the group is locked, I'd suggest leaving it until the group is unlocked. If you do create the game page, I'll help you if you need any assistance. Tman1319 (talk) 01:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The group is locked because it was the players original group, that's why i choose to write about the other one since its still active but i did not know about the polices you guys had in place. I Can provide you with early screenshots of the group it states the owner and description if you want?. And sure i would not mind help but i would prob make it later on since im a bit busy rn.


 * Like I previously stated, even if the original owner use to have the group, the current owner still should get there own article, since you write the article after this originally happen, but the current owner shouldn't be listed since the group is locked. No need for screenshots of the group since it doesn't change anything. Also welcome to the community, we are glad to have you, and you can contact me again when you need the help. Cya until then! Tman1319 (talk) 01:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * yeah but then i cant write about who owns the game and who made it, it would just be an ownerless game? i thought i had enough evidence i mean how else would they make a second edition to the game without being the original group owners? That should be some form of evidence not to mention screenshots but i understand why you would not accept that as proof they can be easily faked.


 * Like I said I will help with necessary steps, and it won't be an owner less game, the group would still be named, but will not be linked to it's own separate page. Like I said for the third time, you can't make articles about those players unless they are the owner of the group, and the group itself is locked, so with the "data" you have on the group may be outdated. You can add the original owners with the references you have on the game page, but you can't actually make there own articles since if they aren't the owner of the group, then there is no way of connecting in notability criteria. The only other option is to list them in the game page or just leave them out, it's your call. Also you can sign your messages by doing this (this is just an example ":Hi there ~(then you put these here 4 times)". Tman1319 (talk) 12:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay so as long as i dont create separate pages for the owner and editions i can include them in the article about the original game correct?


 * Yes you can do the game with 1M+ visits (unless you are applying with it). You can mention the owners on the page, groups and editions along as they play a role on the game, such as creation, updates etc. But cannot get there own page unless they meet one of the notability criterias. Tman1319 (talk) 12:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

(ToCP) Tower of Cruel Punishment (obstacle course)
Hi, my statement of tocp isn’t an opinion , like I said I’ve done multiple research and it is currently the hardest obby beaten on the platform , one reason to support my statement is that if someone beated a much harder obby than tocp , then wouldn’t have it been pointed out a lot in the jtoh community or obby community? If so then why would I say tocp is the hardest beaten obby? You see if other obbyists beat harder obbies than tocp then that that’s when they get a lot of attention and then that’s when I would have said that obby was the hardest obby beaten on Roblox, and besides this is useful information I mean just look at the completion video , it will give obby players a much better view of what the rest of the obby community outside tower of hell really is.

Joemama3693 (talk) 00:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

00:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi there thanks for contacting me, first of all if a player beats a really hard obby, it doesn't mean that it is the hardest obby on Roblox. The research you proposed is only a youtube video of a player beating it, while if people watch it they would say it is the hardest obby as an exxageration (or opinion). To me this is not useful information, it's like saying "the tower of hell is the hardest obby since a player beated it, and the people who watched it are saying it is the hardest obby". Tman1319 (talk) 12:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Metaverse Champions...
I can obtain the Metaverse Champions Items for example sparks dragon or feys sword? Robloxxfan2007 (talk) 03:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry I don't follow, is there something you want me to add to the Metaverse Champions page or? Tman1319 (talk) 11:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Dark Knight Helm
Hi, please stop reverting the changes to the Dark Knight Helm page. I am an original owner of the item, and the changes you are making are inaccurate. It was never on sale in the first place. Saying that it could be "purchased for free" is misleading, as it explicitly required an exploit to attain.

Call23re (talk) 08:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi there, never knew that, so my bad for the interference. Next time you can use the Summary to explain what you are doing then so an editor can know why you made that change. Tman1319 (talk) 15:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Talent Show Group "Ranks" list
Yeah hi not sure how the talk page works so if I'm doing something wrong here then my bad

Anyways the "Ranks" list is meant to list off the members of staff, not just the development team and EDs If removing Discord Mods and Admins is due to excessive length then at the very least the Head Discord Mod and Head Admin sections should still be left in as both departments only ever have two people at a time and are most definitely notable MrKazo5 (talk) 02:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi there thanks for touching with me. I believe none should be listed since they do not need to be listed. The list was meant to show off the different ranks that are within it. The discord is different since those ranks are meant for either moderation or different purposes. It is not notable since there job is to moderate the server, while the other ranks are meant for the actual talent show. Also your edit is not bad and I understand were you are coming from, every edit should be considered in good-faith after all. Have a good day! Tman1319 (talk) 02:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Not sure how to do a double indent to indicate a reply to a reply so I'm hoping two colons works fine but anyways, the different ranks that were previously listed were all group ranks, I've brought the topic of the rank list up for debate in the group's Discord, and one of the head admins responded with "What's the point of having the ranks tab if there's not gonna be the list of the entire staff team" | I can understand that the list of low ranks tends to change often, but I at least think the department heads should be credited in addition to the EDs and developers, as the Head Discord Mods and Head Admins only change once every year or so, and as stated before there's only ever two department heads at any given time, making the list no harder to maintain than before MrKazo5 (talk) 03:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Out of my control now, please talk to a staff member. Tman1319 (talk) 03:39, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Super Editor award
—  03:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I really don't know how to respond to this, but thank you!Tman1319 (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Hey
Why did you put a Candidate for deletion on my new page?

ThatReveseGuy CupCake


 * Your page doesn't meet the notability criteria. I'd suggest reviewing it before making other pages on experiences. Tman1319 (talk) 17:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Bruh why did you do it again.

ThatReveseGuy CupCake


 * I did it again because you insist on keeping a page that doesn't meet the notability criteria? Tman1319 (talk) 17:47, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Korblox Edit
Hello! I noticed that you removed my link to a forum archive as it is not an official service hosted by Roblox. I won't restore it, as you seem to have significantly more editing experience than me, but please just know that the site that does host it is the most extensive and accurate forum archive out there. It was collaborated on by nearly 50 people, and it is consistenty updated. Now that the forums are gone, it is essentially the only place to recover most posts nowadays, other than archive.org if the post is famous enough. The particular post that I linked was actually directly linked to in the Korblox group's description; I just felt like, since that link no longer works anymore, it would be nice if people could see that official history again.

Lord_Nitrous


 * Hi there! Sorry for the late response. To get it straight, I don't mind if you undo my edit or not just because I may have more editing experience. In fact, you did the right thing by contacting my talk page. I get what you mean by detailed archive as I have to used it. However, I don't recommend using that as a source because while I do understand what you mean, keep in mind that sources must come from sources that can be trusted, but in this case the archive is unofficial because it was created by the community as a means of archiving something that no longer exists (such as the wiki being a community project, but shouldn't be used as a source because it is unofficial). I'd recommend going to a staff member in these cases because it could lead to the archive being an exemption for trustworthy sources as it does seem organized and thought threw. But for now, leave it as it is until their is a solution for it. Have a good day! Tman1319 (talk) 22:48, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Hey!

No problem about the response time. Thanks for the clarifications! One thing, though, is there any staff member that you recommend I talk to specifically? I don't want to disturb someone with a question that it's not their job to answer.

Lord_Nitrous


 * I'd recommend talking to any staff member about it, but if your talking about who to contact by activity, I'd say Karasuneth as they get back to user's quicker then most others. It's your choice but that's my suggestion. Tman1319 (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2022 (UTC)