Thread:LocustWorld/@comment-4196050-20180113235713/@comment-34821528-20180115172433

LocustWorld wrote: Zaydandalfie wrote:

LocustWorld wrote:

Zaydandalfie wrote:

LocustWorld wrote:

Zaydandalfie wrote:

LocustWorld wrote: I don't undo their edit right away, what normally happens is I make the edit then it gets changed back to the wrong info shortly after. Today was an exception though, I made the edit at first, it got changed right away, and i did all of that stuff. Well the pages were blanked, which is vandalism. Removing all the content from the page and replacing it is vandalism. I know its vandalism. Today was the only day I've ever done it. I am usually surfing the wikia because I'm a curious guy, and when I see wrong info I am inclined to fix it. But when I fixed it and my edits on the YouTuber page, which I have to change often, are undone (presumably by you most of the time because it's always put back to the same thing), I'm gonna be pretty unnhappy. Your edits are actually biased, and you tried to use vandalism to spread your message (or what looks like) which is why you were blocked. How are my messages bias? Today I fixed wrong things like " This rumor has been disproven, for ROBLOX Admins have been banning ODers a lot " and replaced it with "Some people disagree with this rumor, but it has not been disproven". How is that bias?!?!? It's bias because roblox admins have been banning ODers and the termination of Tremity, so the 'but it has not been disproven' is bias. And you should have left a message on my wall rather than vandalising the page. You have 0 evidence that ROBLOX has been banning ODers (Tremity isn't one of them) while greenlegocats has plenty of evidence that could prove that they don't. If you don't want to be bias, say something about both sides. For example, say "some people disagree and believe that they do ban ODers, but there is no solid evidence that proves the rumor wrong". A ban of a developer who doesn't OD and the ROBLOX rules don't prove anything. Thats still bias though.