Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-34265951-20180330130206

Hello community!

Today I am going to start a consenus on whether players that own notable groups should be notable. My reasons are stated below.

Reasons

 * They would be famous.
 * The owner of a notable group will already be well known, since the owner on the group is shown on the page. They are the ones who created the group and brought it up for fame on the website.
 * Group games.
 * Some group owners prefer to put their place on their group, this means that the creator is the group itself. The original creator won't get the place visits. If the owner created it, then it will never be notable under the curently policy (30/03/18).

Conclusion
I belive that players that own notable groups should be notable, due to the reasons stated above.

Consenus
What do you think? Should players that own notable groups be notable? Post in the comments! 