Thread:Thundermaker300/@comment-24143974-20161010203318/@comment-26126721-20161011105008

MaintenanceRequired wrote: The problem I see it is that it doesn't follow the guidelines. As stated in the talk page, I see the as a means of informing wiki readers about the world of ROBLOX, and thus, we try to stray away from promotion of users unless they meet the guidelines.

The thing about this rule, however, is that it is pretty lenient in the sense that the term "famous" is purely subjective; this is an example of such a case. While some people classify RBXLeaks as a notable user for a page, others don't. This, in turn, becomes pretty hypocritical of the community as we allow some users that may not even be all that famous, but we straight-up delete others.

Unless there is enough evidence statistics-wise, I am still sticking with my decision as to delete the purge, or purge it with other pages to create a standalone page that may include examples of leakers. Understood