Loading editor
  • Hi, some of your recent forum post replies have been removed as they are minimodding or have some relation to such.

    If you see a rule violation or necrobump, don't post "you broke a rule" or "this got necrobumped", or any variation thereof, including going to tell the user they'll be reported to staff. Simply link the thread to an administrator or content moderator, and don't say anything to the matter; we will handle the rest.

    As a main reminder, minimodding and minimod-like replies (of which are often off-topic on their related posts) is not permitted on the Wikia. Please remember that admins are there to manage these things for a reason.


    ~✨~ Anzu || user // contact // CC wall ~✨~

      Loading editor
    Anzu-TLK closed this thread because:
    13:34, August 24, 2018
    • View all 6 replies
    • There is no such thing as misinformative opinion. Opinions will never be true since it is people’s view. No, i am not ranting on the thread what i have said earlier. Opinions of other youtuber or robloxian that isn’t a rant will be considered flamebait? That is too strict.

      I didn’t intend to attack players on that thread, besides it is just a thread that is not controversial talking about 1 player which is not ranting and attacking.

      I don’t want you to define what is the cause and the reasons why the thread is flamebait, i would want to discuss why a such very innocent thread is closed by flamebait.

      Ill repeat “very innocent” but you somehow managed to look it as offensive, attacks and debate (which is not a debate but opinion) and opinions are opinions, some opinions are offensive, some are not (which is mine on the thread).

      You have said it here (

      The threads are not 100% that provokes the argument or harsh debates but the community. Let’s go back to the past where i have created a thread that isn’t really meant to be offensive, it is based on facts and it is considered as news. And then 1 unpopular opinion came out and make me furiously angry, it’s not the thread but the community.

      Harsh debates happen when one has unpopular offensive opinions, and not all of these unpopular opinions are meant to create flame wars (as if it looks intentional).

      You may put into the controversial status instead of flamebait since almost all of the threads are not baiting on flamewars. You may need to close a thread for being controversial instead of being flamebait.

      You may put it to flamebait as if the thread is created to intentionally create flamewars and harsh debates.

      My old thread (february) wasn’t intended to create flamewars, but it is controversial, however, you had settled it to flamebait status instead of being controversial.

      I honestly don’t want to continue this argument about moderation and staff. I kinda want this to be closed, again, sorry for being rude.

      Can you close this after you responded to this message, this argument about taking action and moderation is kinda getting too far because i am getting ruder and offensive on my points.

        Loading editor
    • "Misinformative opinion" refers more to when opinion gets treated in its context as a fact or "almighty truth" when writing, and such attempt at fact is false. They aren't ever "true" or "false" (though they can be brought upon by false notion), but they can be treated like they are, and that's when they become problematic.

      When you're going into detail about a matter based on opinion that's borderline hateful or based on misinformation or misinformative opinion (of which the Meepcity thread was - the entire thread was based on treating an opinion like it's almighty truth) - we start considering it a rant. Rants often bring debate, or even more, argument.

      When threads are misinformative in either sense or intended to be problematic (usually, if you feel it's going to get removed for controversy, then it's probably controversial), we close or remove them before they start an issue. The last few that got responses before we caught them to close them proved this point exactly. They were already getting argumentative. We don't want this on the Wikia.

      Please don't tell us what we can or cannot do. We are enforcing our rules and policies of which were guided and approved by our community; it's what the community wants you to follow, no one likes an argument, and we don't like moderating them (which is why we prefer closing them). If you're insistent on posting them without much issue, consider trying them out at the r/roblox subreddit instead, where they're more lenient on most of what we've reminded you about so far.

      Avoid posting any more intentionally controversial or flamebait threads in the future, because at this point we've asked you enough. Remember - if you think it's going to get removed for being controversial, then it's probably controversial, and you shouldn't post it here.

        Loading editor
  • I am sorry, for using innapropriate language, and sometimes being mean and using “profanity”...


    • I will no longer use profanity in this wikia
    • I will try to be respectful on opinions, unless it is going “too far”
      Loading editor
    Jackmockrock closed this thread because:
    06:18, June 3, 2018
  • Hello,

    Due to your excessive usage of inappropriate language and/or profanity outside of a encyclopedic context, we have blocked your account for 3 days on the Roblox Wikia. Profanity and discussion of inappropriate subjects are not allowed here on our kid-friendly wiki. Please take this time to review our Project:policies and guidelines.

    If you have any questions, you may respond to this message. If you find that you are unable to respond to this message, your block is likely nonnegotiable. (Note: Lacing a response with profanity will only extend your block.)

    Block details: Triggered abuse filter numerous times trying to subvert the filter.
      Loading editor
    Anzu-TLK closed this thread because:
    15:17, August 15, 2018
  • Hello, Jackmockrock. Welcome to the Roblox Wikia! Thank you for your edit to the page Timeline of Roblox history. If you haven’t already, please read the local policies and guidelines (or the simplified rules page) and the Manual of Style. There’s a lot to do around here, so we hope you’ll stay with us and make many improvements.

    • The wiki activity page is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.
    • If you need help using the site, you can take a look at the help pages.
    • Edit your user page to tell the community about yourself!
    • If you are looking for things to do, look at our community page or the wiki insights.
    • Frequently check our news section on the wiki homepage for new Roblox and Roblox Wikia updates.
    • Questions? You can ask on the comments associated with each article if it is about the article topic. For more general questions or editing help, feel free to ask on the forum.

    Please leave me a message if I can help with anything!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.